That’s exactly why I suggest this framework rather than arguments of morality, because one’s moral framework isn’t universal. People still have different views of what’s moral and immoral. Imagine telling a Christian that their God is immoral and they will go leaps and bounds just to make exceptions to their moral code to accept God as the perfect being. Same is to be said about capital. When arguing with someone, it’s best to adhere to their boundaries, rules, and background.